Compare Details Evergreen Valley High ranks better than 98.2% of high schools in California. It also ranks first among 16 ranked high schools in the East Side Union High School District! (See more. )
Compare Details In 2023 the calculated Average Standard Score was 97.56. (See more. )The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) measures the percentage of Evergreen Valley High freshmen who graduate within four years, adjusting for students who transfer in or out.
The high school dropout rate measures the percentage of students who do not complete their high school education.
Chronic absenteeism in a high school refers to a situation where students repeatedly miss school, with the threshold often defined as missing 10% or more of school days for any reason, excused or unexcused.
Student BodyCompare Details Evergreen Valley High has the largest high school student body size in the East Side Union High School District. Racial makeup is: Asian (78.4%), Hispanic (14.2%), White (3.8%). (See more. )
Compare Details 12.6% of students are receiving a free or discounted lunch. This is the lowest percentage in the East Side Union High School District. (See more. )
Compare Details The student/teacher ratio at Evergreen Valley High is 24.2. 14 high schools in the East Side Union High School District have better student/teacher ratios. (See more. )
Compare Evergreen Valley High employs 114.1 full-time teachers.Compare Details The average total spent per student at Evergreen Valley High is $7,317, which is the lowest among 16 high schools in the East Side Union High School District!
Schooldigger 2023 Rankings:SchoolDigger ranks Evergreen Valley High 42 nd of 2348 California public high schools. (See Evergreen Valley High in the ranking list.)
SchoolDigger ranks East Side Union High 674 th of 1563 California school districts. (See district ranking list.)
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 49.83 | 490 th | 1653 | 70.4% | |
2005 | 64.45 | 344 th | 1901 | 81.9% | |
2006 | 78.17 | 148 th | 1968 | 92.5% | |
2007 | 82.58 | 89 th | 2063 | 95.7% | |
2008 | 78.02 | 150 th | 2117 | 92.9% | |
2009 | 77.65 | 150 th | 2238 | 93.3% | |
2010 | 76.38 | 177 th | 2281 | 92.2% | |
2011 | 77.35 | 172 nd | 2367 | 92.7% | |
2012 | 71.22 | 277 th | 2354 | 88.2% | |
2013 | 69.98 | 303 rd | 2426 | 87.5% | |
2015 | 92.39 | 138 th | 1994 | 93.1% | |
2016 | 94.08 | 95 th | 2039 | 95.3% | |
2017 | 94.98 | 81 st | 2021 | 96.0% | |
2018 | 95.90 | 66 th | 2017 | 96.7% | |
2019 | 95.81 | 87 th | 2133 | 95.9% | |
2021 | 94.70 | 60 th | 1290 | 95.3% | |
2022 | 98.12 | 41 st | 2123 | 98.1% | |
2023 | 97.56 | 42 nd | 2348 | 98.2% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 92.14 | 15 th | 366 | 95.9% | |
2019 | 82.52 | 57 th | 422 | 86.5% | |
2022 | 93.30 | 11 th | 515 | 97.9% | |
2023 | 79.62 | 107 th | 786 | 86.4% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 83.62 | 85 th | 938 | 90.9% | |
2019 | 79.73 | 67 th | 941 | 92.9% | |
2021 | 52.65 | 163 rd | 467 | 65.1% | |
2022 | 79.58 | 61 st | 1044 | 94.2% | |
2023 | 83.81 | 26 th | 1323 | 98.0% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 77.42 | 135 th | 1547 | 91.3% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 91.78 | 126 th | 1862 | 93.2% | |
2019 | 89.12 | 146 th | 1937 | 92.5% | |
2021 | 92.53 | 60 th | 1126 | 94.7% | |
2022 | 90.95 | 134 th | 1943 | 93.1% | |
2023 | 98.14 | 38 th | 2247 | 98.3% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 94.96 | 58 th | 1760 | 96.7% | |
2019 | 94.46 | 86 th | 1833 | 95.3% | |
2021 | 95.65 | 35 th | 1054 | 96.7% | |
2022 | 97.51 | 36 th | 1858 | 98.1% | |
2023 | 97.42 | 35 th | 2118 | 98.3% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 32.44 | 650 th | 1052 | 38.2% | |
2019 | 55.88 | 340 th | 1117 | 69.6% | |
2021 | 72.50 | 90 th | 555 | 83.8% | |
2022 | 77.68 | 147 th | 1161 | 87.3% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 95.96 | 76 th | 1834 | 95.9% | |
2019 | 95.62 | 80 th | 1880 | 95.7% | |
2021 | 93.51 | 76 th | 1122 | 93.2% | |
2022 | 98.10 | 45 th | 1916 | 97.7% | |
2023 | 97.13 | 53 rd | 2207 | 97.6% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 78.80 | 125 th | 581 | 78.5% | |
2019 | 79.12 | 106 th | 582 | 81.8% | |
2022 | 82.79 | 80 th | 581 | 86.2% | |
2023 | 80.57 | 116 th | 731 | 84.1% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 78.96 | 334 th | 1742 | 80.8% | |
2019 | 68.81 | 456 th | 1814 | 74.9% | |
2022 | 71.15 | 408 th | 1861 | 78.1% | |
2023 | 85.49 | 164 th | 2142 | 92.3% |
Year | Avg Standard Score | Statewide Rank | Total # Ranked High Schools | CA State Percentile | SchoolDigger Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 92.84 | 41 st | 1173 | 96.5% | |
2019 | 90.39 | 75 th | 1222 | 93.9% | |
2022 | 93.95 | 39 th | 1204 | 96.8% | |
2023 | 79.76 | 181 st | 1434 | 87.4% |
Data source: test scores: California Department of Education, rankings: SchoolDigger.com
As you review the school rankings data, please be aware that some of the information from certain demographics is missing. The reason for this omission is that the data has been redacted from the source data itself due to low population samples in these specific demographic groups.
Redacting data from low population samples is a necessary step to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, as small sample sizes may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, this measure helps protect the privacy of individuals belonging to these demographic groups.
Evergreen Valley High Test ScoresData source: California Department of Education
We're sorry, but no reviews have been submitted for Evergreen Valley High.
If you have first-hand knowledge about Evergreen Valley High, submit a rating!
Reviews:
No reviews have been submitted!
Year | White | African American | Asian | Hispanic | American Indian | Pacific Islander | Two or More Races | Not Specified | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 160 | 40 | 458 | 203 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 863 |
2003 | 160 | 40 | 458 | 203 | 2 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 863 |
2004 | 264 | 73 | 846 | 360 | 1 | n/a | n/a | 2 | 1546 |
2005 | 335 | 100 | 1205 | 477 | 3 | n/a | n/a | 4 | 2124 |
2006 | 353 | 111 | 1388 | 547 | 7 | n/a | n/a | 5 | 2411 |
2007 | 322 | 105 | 1516 | 620 | 5 | n/a | n/a | 12 | 2580 |
2008 | 297 | 103 | 1548 | 638 | 9 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 2595 |
2009 | 265 | 104 | 1564 | 623 | 7 | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2601 |
2010 | 272 | 101 | 1700 | 628 | 7 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 2737 |
2011 | 229 | 82 | 1715 | 598 | 8 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 2657 |
2012 | 204 | 71 | 1758 | 546 | 6 | 12 | 32 | 0 | 2629 |
2013 | 191 | 52 | 1838 | 534 | 5 | 13 | 60 | 0 | 2693 |
2014 | 169 | 45 | 1899 | 546 | 2 | 16 | 57 | 0 | 2734 |
2015 | 144 | 41 | 1982 | 517 | 2 | 15 | 62 | 0 | 2763 |
2016 | 128 | 42 | 2066 | 507 | 1 | 12 | 53 | 0 | 2809 |
2017 | 126 | 36 | 2138 | 499 | 2 | 11 | 56 | 0 | 2868 |
2018 | 115 | 35 | 2233 | 449 | 3 | 11 | 86 | 0 | 2932 |
2019 | 112 | 28 | 2300 | 421 | 3 | 12 | 85 | 0 | 2961 |
2020 | 114 | 20 | 2313 | 433 | 3 | 9 | 86 | 0 | 2978 |
2021 | 113 | 23 | 2316 | 426 | 2 | 10 | 108 | 1 | 2999 |
2022 | 117 | 22 | 2259 | 407 | 1 | 11 | 78 | 1 | 2896 |
2023 | 104 | 16 | 2170 | 393 | 1 | 4 | 79 | 0 | 2767 |
Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.
About Enrollment/Ethnicity
For more information about how the Department of Education defines ethnicity, see Defining Race and Ethnicity Data, National Center for Education Statistics
Year | # Students | Full-time Teachers | Student/Teacher ratio | % Free/Discounted Lunch |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 863 | 48.4 | 17.8 | 0 |
2003 | 863 | 48.4 | 17.8 | 0 |
2004 | 1546 | 78.5 | 19.7 | 0 |
2005 | 2124 | 91.6 | 23.2 | 12.3 |
2006 | 2411 | 97.9 | 24.6 | 10.8 |
2007 | 2580 | 105.2 | 24.5 | 11 |
2008 | 2595 | 116.8 | 22.2 | 12.7 |
2009 | 2601 | 103.5 | 22.9 | 11.6 |
2010 | 2737 | 91.6 | 29.8 | 13.7 |
2011 | 2657 | n/a | n/a | 13.4 |
2012 | 2629 | 99.9 | 26.3 | n/a |
2013 | 2693 | 100.8 | 26.7 | 15.6 |
2014 | 2734 | 103.9 | 26.3 | 17.7 |
2015 | 2763 | 105.0 | 26.3 | 16 |
2016 | 2809 | 110.0 | 25.5 | 17 |
2017 | 2868 | 110.2 | 26.0 | 16.3 |
2018 | 2932 | 116.0 | 25.2 | 18.9 |
2019 | 2961 | 115.2 | 25.6 | 16 |
2020 | 2978 | n/a | n/a | 14.8 |
2021 | 2999 | 110.9 | 27.0 | 17.6 |
2022 | 2896 | 113.3 | 25.5 | 16.5 |
2023 | 2767 | 114.1 | 24.2 | 12.6 |
Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.
About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch :
The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.
Year | # Students | Full-time Teachers | Student/Teacher ratio | % Free/Discounted Lunch |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 863 | 48.4 | 17.8 | 0 |
2003 | 863 | 48.4 | 17.8 | 0 |
2004 | 1546 | 78.5 | 19.7 | 0 |
2005 | 2124 | 91.6 | 23.2 | 12.3 |
2006 | 2411 | 97.9 | 24.6 | 10.8 |
2007 | 2580 | 105.2 | 24.5 | 11 |
2008 | 2595 | 116.8 | 22.2 | 12.7 |
2009 | 2601 | 103.5 | 22.9 | 11.6 |
2010 | 2737 | 91.6 | 29.8 | 13.7 |
2011 | 2657 | n/a | n/a | 13.4 |
2012 | 2629 | 99.9 | 26.3 | n/a |
2013 | 2693 | 100.8 | 26.7 | 15.6 |
2014 | 2734 | 103.9 | 26.3 | 17.7 |
2015 | 2763 | 105.0 | 26.3 | 16 |
2016 | 2809 | 110.0 | 25.5 | 17 |
2017 | 2868 | 110.2 | 26.0 | 16.3 |
2018 | 2932 | 116.0 | 25.2 | 18.9 |
2019 | 2961 | 115.2 | 25.6 | 16 |
2020 | 2978 | n/a | n/a | 14.8 |
2021 | 2999 | 110.9 | 27.0 | 17.6 |
2022 | 2896 | 113.3 | 25.5 | 16.5 |
2023 | 2767 | 114.1 | 24.2 | 12.6 |
Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.
About Student-Teacher Ratio
Student/teacher ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of students by the total number of full-time equivalent teachers. Please note that a smaller student/teacher ratio does not necessarily translate to smaller class size. In some instances, schools hire teachers part time, and some teachers are hired for specialized instruction with very small class sizes. These and other factors contribute to the student/teacher ratio. Note: For private schools, Student/teacher ratio may not include Pre-Kindergarten.